Policy Update: 8/20/25

Sasha@iaje.us

Deployment of National Guard & Militarization in D.C. Updates:

Overview:
The National Guard and federal agencies were deployed in Washington, D.C. last week under an executive order declaring a "crime emergency." This marks the beginning of a federal takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD), bypassing D.C.'s local control.

Community Impact:
The presence of military personnel is reported to have caused public fear and business disruption, contradicting federal claims of increased safety. Local leaders, advocates, and residents report a chilling effect on civil liberties.

Legislative Pushback & Local Resistance

Overview:
Members of Congress have introduced a joint resolution to end the federalization of D.C. 's police force and restore home rule protections under the 1973 Home Rule Act.

Competing Action:
Rep. Luna has introduced a separate resolution to extend the federal emergency powers. This competing measure would prolong the militarized presence in the District.

  • Resolution: H.J.Res.114 – Extend Emergency

Sanctuary Jurisdictions Receive DOJ Letters

Overview:
As of August 5, the Department of Justice has sent letters to dozens of sanctuary states, counties, and cities warning of escalated enforcement. These jurisdictions may face federal scrutiny or funding threats.

Detention Expansion: ICE Plans to Double Capacity

Overview:
Leaked ICE documents show plans to more than double immigrant detention capacity, targeting over 107,000 beds. This includes new family detention centers, tent camps, and "mega-facilities."

Recommended Staff Reading:
This article outlines the billions in funding behind this expansion and the direct implications for community members and advocates.

 Parole & Expedited Removal Updates

Key Updates:

  • CHIRLA v. Noem: DC Circuit Court of Appeals lifted part of the stay – DHS can now put parolees in expedited removal if arrived <2 years ago 

  • Individuals within the 2-year arrival window are now at increased risk of expedited removal, including those previously shielded under parole or deferred action.

  • Doe v. Noem: DHS should be adjudicating benefits requests from parolees

Previous
Previous

Policy update: 8/27/25

Next
Next

Policy Update: 8/13/25